Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Cost and yield considerations when expanding recruitment for genetic studies: the primary open-angle African American glaucoma genetics study

  • Rebecca Salowe1,
  • Laura O’Keefe1,
  • Sayaka Merriam1,
  • Roy Lee1,
  • Naira Khachatryan1,
  • Prithvi Sankar1,
  • Eydie Miller-Ellis1,
  • Amanda Lehman1,
  • Victoria Addis1,
  • Windell Murphy2,
  • Jeffrey Henderer3,
  • Maureen Maguire1 and
  • Joan O’Brien1Email author
BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:101

Received: 2 February 2017

Accepted: 26 June 2017

Published: 14 July 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
2 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephanie Fullerton
27 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Dohan
26 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Rebecca Salowe
Resubmission - Version 2
26 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephanie Fullerton
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
14 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0374-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
, Philadelphia, USA
Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA