Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Repeat: a framework to assess empirical reproducibility in biomedical research

  • Leslie D. McIntosh1,
  • Anthony Juehne1Email author,
  • Cynthia R. H. Vitale2,
  • Xiaoyan Liu1,
  • Rosalia Alcoser1,
  • J. Christian Lukas1 and
  • Bradley Evanoff3
BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:143

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0377-6

Received: 26 June 2017

Accepted: 27 June 2017

Published: 18 September 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David A. Dorr
2 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Pieczkiewicz
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
27 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
18 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0377-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
(2)
University Libraries, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA
(3)
Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA

Advertisement