This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR is dependent on the pair of reviewers
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 7 April 2017
Accepted: 30 June 2017
Published: 11 July 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Apr 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roberta Scherer|
|30 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alexandra Rouquette|
|2 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Segun Bello|
|22 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Dawid Pieper|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roberta Scherer|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|11 Jul 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0380-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.