Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Choice of futility boundaries for group sequential designs with two endpoints

BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:119

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0387-4

Received: 25 January 2017

Accepted: 30 June 2017

Published: 8 August 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - LiAn Lin
31 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lucie Biard
28 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Svenja Schüler
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - LiAn Lin
30 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lucie Biard
9 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Svenja Schüler
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
30 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
8 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0387-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
(2)
Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Advertisement