This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Choice of futility boundaries for group sequential designs with two endpoints
© The Author(s) 2017
Received: 25 January 2017
Accepted: 30 June 2017
Published: 8 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Jan 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - LiAn Lin|
|31 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lucie Biard|
|28 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Svenja Schüler|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - LiAn Lin|
|30 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lucie Biard|
|9 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Svenja Schüler|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|8 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0387-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.