Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Clarifying the distinction between case series and cohort studies in systematic reviews of comparative studies: potential impact on body of evidence and workload

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mina Tadrous
28 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laura Rosella
14 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Tim Mathes
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mina Tadrous
19 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Tim Mathes
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
10 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
17 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0391-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement