Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A mega-ethnography of eleven qualitative evidence syntheses exploring the experience of living with chronic non-malignant pain

BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:116

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0392-7

Received: 3 March 2017

Accepted: 10 July 2017

Published: 1 August 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jane Noyes
18 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicky Britten
15 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Francine Toye
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
10 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
1 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0392-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
(2)
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
(3)
Royal College of Nursing Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

Advertisement