This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Why statistical inference from clinical trials is likely to generate false and irreproducible results
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 25 March 2017
Accepted: 2 August 2017
Published: 22 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|25 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rosser Matthews|
|25 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - William Grant|
|30 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Leonid Hanin|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rosser Matthews|
|2 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Leonid Hanin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|22 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0399-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.