This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Using Bayesian statistics to estimate the likelihood a new trial will demonstrate the efficacy of a new treatment
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 11 March 2017
Accepted: 2 August 2017
Published: 22 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|11 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - LiAn Lin|
|2 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tiejun Tong|
|31 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - David Biau|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|31 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tiejun Tong|
|30 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - LiAn Lin|
|10 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - David Biau|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|22 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0401-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.