Skip to main content

Table 1 Description of the retrieved trials

From: Using Bayesian statistics to estimate the likelihood a new trial will demonstrate the efficacy of a new treatment

First author

e-date

Imaging

Female/malea

Age (mean)

BMI (mean)

RSG

AC

BOPH

BOA

IOD

SR

OB

Chareancholvanich

02/03/2013

mri

70/10

70

28

low

uk

high

low

low

low

uk

Victor

26/04/2013

mri/ct

86/42

67

-

uk

low

high

low

high

low

high

Roh

03/08/2013

ct

82/8

70

27

low

low

high

uk

high

low

uk

Hamilton

06/08/2013

ct

31/21

68

31

uk

uk

high

low

high

low

uk

Boonen

10/08/2013

mri

106/74

67

30

low

low

high

low

low

low

low

Parratte

15/08/2013

mri

24/16

71

29

high

low

high

low

low

low

uk

Chotanaphuti

04/09/2013

ct

70/10

70

25

uk

uk

high

low

low

low

low

Woolson

07/03/2014

ct

0/63

66

33

low

low

high

low

high

low

low

Kotela

28/06/2014

ct

66/29

67

30

uk

uk

high

low

low

low

low

Pfitzner

16/07/2014

mri/ct

51/39

65b

30

low

low

high

low

low

low

low

Yan

14/09/2014

mri

41/19

69

-

low

uk

high

low

low

low

uk

Abane

09/01/2015

mri

88/52

69

29

low

uk

high

low

high

low

low

Molicnik

04/03/2015

mri

31/7

67

33

uk

uk

high

uk

uk

low

uk

  1. RSG random sequence generation, AC allocation concealment, BOPH blinding of participants/care providers, BOA blinding of outcome assessors, IOD incomplete outcome data, SR selective reporting, OB other biases. a sex ratio in shown for patients randomized and outcome is shown for patients analyzed, therefore numbers may differ. b mean of group’s median