The impact of self-interviews on response patterns for sensitive topics: a randomized trial of electronic delivery methods for a sexual behaviour questionnaire in rural South Africa
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Day|
|2 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Roxanne Beauclair|
|4 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Timo Gnambs|
|31 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Guy Harling|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|31 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Day|
|24 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Timo Gnambs|
|5 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Guy Harling|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|17 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0403-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.