Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Laure Boulesteix
31 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachael Hughes
21 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Sullivan
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Laure Boulesteix
14 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachael Hughes
31 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Sullivan
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
31 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
6 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0414-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement