This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 10 February 2017
Accepted: 31 August 2017
Published: 6 September 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Feb 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anne-Laure Boulesteix|
|31 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rachael Hughes|
|21 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Sullivan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anne-Laure Boulesteix|
|14 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rachael Hughes|
|31 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Sullivan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|6 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0414-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.