Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Multiple imputation for handling missing outcome data when estimating the relative risk

  • Thomas R. Sullivan1Email author,
  • Katherine J. Lee2, 3,
  • Philip Ryan1 and
  • Amy B. Salter1
BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:134

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0414-5

Received: 10 February 2017

Accepted: 31 August 2017

Published: 6 September 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Laure Boulesteix
31 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachael Hughes
21 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Sullivan
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne-Laure Boulesteix
14 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachael Hughes
31 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Sullivan
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
31 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
6 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0414-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The University of Adelaide, School of Public Health, Adelaide, Australia
(2)
Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melville, Australia
(3)
Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

Advertisement