This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Design considerations and analysis planning of a phase 2a proof of concept study in rheumatoid arthritis in the presence of possible non-monotonicity
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 6 March 2017
Accepted: 31 August 2017
Published: 2 October 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|6 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|31 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Smith|
|21 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joseph Koopmeiners|
|30 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Feng Liu|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joseph Koopmeiners|
|7 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Smith|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|2 Oct 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0416-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.