Towards evidence-based computational statistics: lessons from clinical research on the role and design of real-data benchmark studies
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Annamaria Guolo|
|10 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sylvie Chevret|
|1 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Anne-Laure Boulesteix|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|9 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0417-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.