Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Longitudinal studies that use data collected as part of usual care risk reporting biased results: a systematic review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ann Christina Foldenauer
23 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Md Nazmul Karim
24 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Delaram Farzanfar
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Md Nazmul Karim
3 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ann Christina Foldenauer
6 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Delaram Farzanfar
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Md Nazmul Karim
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
31 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
6 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0418-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement