This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems: generalizable lessons from the NIH Collaboratory
- Kevin P. Weinfurt1, 2, 3Email author,
- Adrian F. Hernandez2, 4,
- Gloria D. Coronado5,
- Lynn L. DeBar5,
- Laura M. Dember6,
- Beverly B. Green7,
- Patrick J. Heagerty8,
- Susan S. Huang9,
- Kathryn T. James8,
- Jeffrey G. Jarvik8,
- Eric B. Larson10,
- Vincent Mor11,
- Richard Platt12,
- Gary E. Rosenthal13,
- Edward J. Septimus14,
- Gregory E. Simon7,
- Karen L. Staman15,
- Jeremy Sugarman16,
- Miguel Vazquez17,
- Douglas Zatzick18 and
- Lesley H. Curtis2, 4
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 26 June 2017
Accepted: 31 August 2017
Published: 18 September 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|26 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vance Berger|
|12 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lila Finney Rutten|
|11 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Kevin Weinfurt|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|18 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0420-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.