Skip to main content

Table 4 Missing values in study questionnaire (Model 3)

From: Recruiting former melanoma patients via hospitals in comparison to office-based dermatologists in a register-based cohort study that required indirect contact

Effect

OR

95% Confidence Limits

p-value

Physician characteristics

ā€ƒLocation of hospital/practice (urban versus rural)

1.37

0.85

2.20

0.20

ā€ƒMedian age of patientsa assigned to institution

0.99

0.97

1.02

0.72

ā€ƒSize of catchment areaa

1.01

0.10

1.02

0.10

ā€ƒMedian tumor stage of all patients assigned to the physician

0.97

0.56

1.67

0.91

ā€ƒNumber of contacts before participation

1.14

0.89

1.46

0.29

ā€ƒRecruitment proportion

0.67

0.15

2.91

0.59

Patient characteristics

ā€ƒAge of participant (years)

1.02

1.01

1.04

0.001

ā€ƒSex (female versus male)

1.37

1.01

1.86

0.04

ā€ƒParticipation after 2 contactsb

1.25

0.90

1.73

0.19

ā€ƒParticipation after ā‰„ā€‰3 contactsb

2.55

1.45

4.51

0.001

ā€ƒTime since diagnosis (years)

0.98

0.88

1.08

0.64

ā€ƒPlace of residence (urban versus rural)

0.93

0.67

1.27

0.64

ā€ƒSocial stratum (middle versus low)

0.66

0.48

0.91

0.01

ā€ƒSocial stratum (high versus low)

0.69

0.46

1.03

0.07

ā€ƒRecruited by hospital versus office-based physician

0.50

0.20

1.26

0.14

  1. anumber of community codes the responding patients of each physician belong to
  2. bReference: Early responders (Participation after the first mail-out of study documents))