Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review

BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:152

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0431-4

Received: 17 July 2017

Accepted: 15 November 2017

Published: 28 November 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Jul 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tari Turner
27 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pentti Nieminen
11 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Tim Mathes
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
15 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
28 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0431-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute for Research in Operative Medicinem, Chair of Surgical Research, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany

Advertisement