Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Classification schemes for knowledge translation interventions: a practical resource for researchers

  • Susan E. Slaughter1Email author,
  • Gabrielle L. Zimmermann2, 3,
  • Megan Nuspl2,
  • Heather M. Hanson3, 4,
  • Lauren Albrecht1,
  • Rosmin Esmail3, 4,
  • Khara Sauro4,
  • Amanda S. Newton1,
  • Maoliosa Donald3,
  • Michele P. Dyson1,
  • Denise Thomson2 and
  • Lisa Hartling1, 2
BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:161

Received: 31 August 2017

Accepted: 22 November 2017

Published: 6 December 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
31 Aug 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alden Gross
5 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ann Catrine Eldh
3 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Susan Slaughter
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
6 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0441-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Alberta SPOR SUPPORT Unit KT Platform, Edmonton, Canada
University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada