Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jehanzeb Cheema
20 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ying Yuan
10 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Janus Jakobsen
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jehanzeb Cheema
4 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ying Yuan
18 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Janus Jakobsen
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
24 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
6 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement