Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials – a practical guide with flowcharts

  • Janus Christian Jakobsen1, 2Email author,
  • Christian Gluud1,
  • Jørn Wetterslev1 and
  • Per Winkel1
BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:162

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1

Received: 30 May 2017

Accepted: 24 November 2017

Published: 6 December 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jehanzeb Cheema
20 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ying Yuan
10 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Janus Jakobsen
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jehanzeb Cheema
4 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ying Yuan
18 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Janus Jakobsen
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
24 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
6 Dec 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
(2)
Department of Cardiology, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark

Advertisement