Skip to main content

Table 6 Confounding scenarios for indirect ICS effect on BW with heterogeneity of errors

From: On the use of the outcome variable “small for gestational age” when gestational age is a potential mediator: a maternal asthma perspective

Scenario

(model, interpretation of effect)

mean

se

null ICS effect?

Confounding 1 (M1, total)

−513.28

0.2388

no

Confounding 1 (M1,V, total)

−366.76

0.2579

no

Confounding 1 (M2, direct)

−0.2363

0.2328

yes

Confounding 1 (M2,V, direct)

−0.2306

0.2353

yes

Confounding 1 (M3, total)

1.5614

0.0015

no

Confounding 1 (M3,V, total)

1.1601

0.0016

no

Confounding 1 (M4, direct)

−0.0011

0.0015

yes

Confounding 1 (M4,V, direct)

−0.0001

0.0016

yes

Confounding 2 (M1, total)

−366.46

0.2600

no

Confounding 2 (M1,V, total)

−366.58

0.2312

no

Confounding 2 (M2, direct)

24.188

0.2168

no

Confounding 2 (M2,V, direct)

−0.1823

0.2167

yes

Confounding 2 (M3, total)

1.0759

0.0012

no

Confounding 2 (M3,V, total)

1.1475

0.0012

no

Confounding 2 (M4, direct)

0.0125

0.0013

no

Confounding 2 (M4,V, direct)

0.0127

0.0013

no

Confounding 3 (M1, total)

−406.71

0.2335

no

Confounding 3 (M1,V, total)

−366.76

0.2593

no

Confounding 3 (M2, direct)

−40.210

0.2226

no

Confounding 3 (M2,V, direct)

−0.2394

0.2378

yes

Confounding 3 (M3, total)

1.3095

0.0017

no

Confounding 3 (M3,V, total)

1.1839

0.0019

no

Confounding 3 (M4, direct)

0.1738

0.0014

no

Confounding 3 (M4,V, direct)

0.0050

0.0016

no

Confounding 4 (M1, total)

−553.28

0.2444

no

Confounding 4 (M1,V, total)

−366.76

0.2579

no

Confounding 4 (M2, direct)

−10.454

0.2361

no

Confounding 4 (M2,V, direct)

−0.2306

0.2353

yes

Confounding 4 (M3, total)

1.6301

0.0013

no

Confounding 4 (M3,V, total)

1.1518

0.0014

no

Confounding 4 (M4, direct)

0.1859

0.0014

no

Confounding 4 (M4,V, direct)

0.0120

0.0015

no

  1. Legend. Mean of the estimated exposure (ICS) effect (mean difference or log odds ratio) on the outcome (BW, LBW or SGA) based on 1000 samples of size 20,000, with Monte Carlo standard error (se)
  2. Confounding Scenario 1: confounder between ICS and GA; Confounding Scenario 2: confounder between GA and BW; Confounding Scenario 3: confounder between ICS and BW; Confounding Scenario 4: confounder between ICS, GA and BW
  3. M1: BW ~ ICS; M2: BW ~ ICS + GA; M 3 : LBW ~ ICS; M4: SGA ~ ICS;
  4. null ICS effect = yes if 0 mean ± 1.96se
  5. Models subscripted by V additionally include the V variable in the regression model
  6. Abbreviations: BW birth weight, GA gestational age, ICS inhaled corticosteroids, LBW low birth weight, SGA small for gestational age