Comparison of nuisance parameters in pediatric versus adult randomized trials: a meta-epidemiologic empirical evaluation
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Jun 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zhongheng Zhang|
|1 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hsin-Chou Yang|
|29 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Ben Vandermeer|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|10 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0456-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.