Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of Simulations for Scenario 1

From: A comparison of estimators from self-controlled case series, case-crossover design, and sequence symmetry analysis for pharmacoepidemiological studies

 

Setting

Results of simulations

Methods (Effect measures)

β X

Mean of estimates (Ratio scale)

Bias (Log scale)

Empirical standard error

Mean squared error

Mean standard error

Coverage (%)

SCCS (IRR)

log(1.0)

0.99

-0.0125

0.1354

0.0185

0.1335

95.1

CCO (OR)

 

1.00

-0.0005

0.2084

0.0434

0.2116

96.1

SSA (ASR)

 

0.99

-0.0005

0.2373

0.0563

0.2454

96.3

SCCS (IRR)

log(3.0)

2.99

-0.0030

0.0791

0.0063

0.0777

94.7

CCO (OR)

 

3.04

0.0121

0.18

0.0309

0.1732

94.8

SSA (ASR)

 

3.04

0.0119

0.2016

0.0408

0.2003

95.2

SCCS (IRR)

log(10.0)

9.98

-0.0019

0.0438

0.0019

0.0446

95.5

CCO (OR)

 

10.30

0.0295

0.1663

0.0285

0.1604

94.4

SSA (ASR)

 

9.97

-0.0026

0.1834

0.0336

0.1817

94.7

  1. Abbreviations ASR adjusted sequence ratio, CCO case-crossover, IRR incident rate ratio, OR odds ratio, SCCS self-controlled case series, SSA sequence symmetry analysis