A systematic comparison of recurrent event models for application to composite endpoints
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Aug 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Szarek|
|22 Oct 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yishu Wei|
|13 Nov 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Ann-Kathrin Ozga|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Nov 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Szarek|
|26 Nov 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yishu Wei|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Dec 2017||Editorially accepted|
|4 Jan 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0462-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.