Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paola Rosati
9 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cole Wayant
31 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - GUOWEI LI
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cole Wayant
24 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paola Rosati
27 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - GUOWEI LI
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paola Rosati
14 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - GUOWEI LI
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - GUOWEI LI
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
21 Dec 2017 Editorially accepted
11 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0465-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement