Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics in cohort studies reporting and not reporting HTE

From: Reporting of heterogeneity of treatment effect in cohort studies: a review of the literature

Study characteristics

All studies

(n = 150)

Studies addressing

HTE (n = 88)

Studies not addressing

HTE (n = 62)

p-value

Studies addressing HTEa,* (n = 111)

Sample size, Med(Q1-Q3)

1633(310–9505)

3754(850–20,474)

470(130–2210)

<0.001

1235(201–6133)

Length of follow up (years), Med(Q1-Q3)

3.5(1.2–7.2)

5(2–10)

2(0.5–4.2)

<0.001

3(1–6)

Date of publication

   

0.04

 

 2000–2013

72(48)

47(53.4)

23(37)

 

52(47)

 2014–2016

78(52)

41(46.6)

39(63)

 

59(53)

Journal type, n(%)

   

<0.001

 

 High impact factor journals (HIJ)

75(50)

55(62.5)

20(32.2)

 

52(47)

 Low impact factor journals (LIJ)

75(50)

33(37.5)

42(67.8)

 

59(53)

Source of funding, n(%)

   

0.85

 

 Industry

100(66.7)

62(70.5)

38(61.3)

 

69(62)

 Other

31(20.7)

19(21.6)

10(16.1)

 

22(20)

 NA

19(12.6)

7(8)

14(22.6)

 

20(18)

Study area, n(%)

   

<0.001

 

 Interventional

50(32.7)

19(21.6)

31(50)

 

54(49)

 Pharmacological

89(60)

64(72.7)

25(40.3)

 

56(50)

 Other

11(7.3)

5(5.7)

6(9.7)

 

1(1)

Type of primary outcome, n(%)

   

0.004

 

 Time to event

65(44)

48(54.5)

17(27.4)

 

46(41)

 Binary

50(32.7)

24(27.3)

26(42)

 

37(33)

 Continuous

35(22)

16(18.2)

19(30.6)

 

28(26)

Main effect of primary outcome, n(%)

   

0.6

 

 Statistically significant

96(64.6)

58(65.9)

38(61.3)

 

69(62)

 Not statistically significant

54(35.4)

30(34.1)

24(38.7)

 

42(38)

Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Score, n(%)

   

0.82

 

 0–3

5(3)

3(3)

2(3)

 

3(3)

 4–6

88(59)

54(61)

34(55)

 

64(58)

 7–8

57(38)

31(35)

26(29)

 

44(40)

HTE reporting

88(58.7)

88(100)

 

49(44)

Analysis of predictive factors on side effects, n(%)

2(1.3)

2(2.3)

 

2(2)

Prespecification of HTE analysis, n(%)

84(56)

84(95.4)

 

46(94)

Type of HTE analysis, n(%)

     

 Subgroup

2(1.3)

2(2.3)

 

2(4)

 Adjusted

67(44.7)

67(76.1)

 

34(69)

 Propension

19(12.7)

19(21.6)

 

13(27)

Predictive variables studied, n(%)

     

 Age

30(20)

30(34)

 

30(61)

 Sexe

15(10)

15(17)

 

15(31)

 Social level

4(2.7)

4(4.5)

 

4(8)

 Genetics

12(8)

12(13.6)

 

12(24)

 Treatment

66(44)

66(75)

 

27(55)

 Comorbidities

31(20.7)

31(35)

 

31(63)

 Severity of disease

13(8.7)

13(14.7)

 

13(26)

Prognostic variables studied, n(%)

51(34)

31(35.2)

20(3.2)

0.73

31(28)

Analysis of prognostic factors on side effect, n(%)

2(1.3)

1(1.1)

1(1.6)

0.71

1(1)

Interaction test, n(%)

27(18)

27(31)

0(0)

8(7)

  1. aexcluding studies assessing only a form of treatment
  2. *to determinate p-value we used the Wilcoxon rank sum test for the analysis of continuous data and the chi square/fisher test for binary data