Skip to main content

Table 1 The checklist used for assessment of methodology reporting in this study, modified from the CONSORT for Abstracts guidelines

From: Structure formats of randomised controlled trial abstracts: a cross-sectional analysis of their current usage and association with methodology reporting

Items/Supplementary itemsa

Criteria/Contentb

1. Design

Explicit description of the trial design (e.g. parallel, cluster, crossover)

2. Participants

Eligibility criteria for participants

3. Setting

Settings where the data were collected

4. Interventions

Interventions intended for each group

5. Outcome

Clearly defined primary/main outcome(s) for the trial

5a. Time point

When was the primary/main outcome(s) assessed

5b. No. of outcomes c

The number of described primary/main outcome(s)

6. Random assignment

Clear statement that participants were allocated to groups in a randomised manner

6a. Unit of randomisation

Description of the unit of randomisation (e.g. patients, schools, communities)

7. Sequence generation

Method used for random sequence generation

8. Allocation concealment

Method used for allocation concealment

9. Blinding (Masking)

Whether or not participants, caregivers, and those assessing the outcomes were blinded to group assignment

9a. Generic blinding

Generic description only (e.g. single-blind, double-blind)

  1. CONSORT for Abstracts: the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) extension guidelines for reporting of RCT abstracts [23]
  2. aOnly the scores of main quality items (no.1 to 9) contributed to the primary outcome (overall quality score, range: 0 to 9); supplementary items (5a, 5b, 6a, 9a) were documented for information purposes only
  3. bDetailed scoring criteria are available in the online Appendix
  4. cA continuous variable, not dichotomous