Skip to main content

Table 6 The 90th percentile confidence intervals for all performance measure estimates of each method for Scenario 5 in Table 1 (corresponding to Fig. 5)

From: Outlier classification performance of risk adjustment methods when profiling multiple providers

Measure

S

L R F

L R R

g P S A

g P S W

g P S WT

g P S MWS

Sensitivity

1

0.40, 0.80

0.00, 0.20

0.00, 0.20

0.00, 0.10

0.00, 0.20

0.00, 0.20

 

2

0.50, 0.90

0.00, 0.30

0.00, 0.30

0.00, 0.20

0.00, 0.20

0.00, 0.20

Specificity

1

0.55, 0.78

0.97, 1.00

0.97, 1.00

0.92, 1.00

0.92, 1.00

0.90, 0.97

 

2

0.57, 0.80

0.98, 1.00

0.98, 1.00

0.92, 1.00

0.95, 1.00

0.90, 1.00

PPV

1

0.20, 0.41

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 0.67

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 0.67

 

2

0.27, 0.53

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

0.00, 1.00

NPV

1

0.80, 0.93

0.80, 0.83

0.80, 0.83

0.79, 0.82

0.79, 0.83

0.78, 0.83

 

2

0.84, 0.97

0.80, 0.85

0.80, 0.85

0.79, 0.83

0.79, 0.83

0.79, 0.83

  1. S = amount of sides that the outliers were drawn from; PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value