Simulation shows undesirable results for competing risks analysis with time-dependent covariates for clinical outcomes
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|24 Sep 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yimei Li|
|17 Jan 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Olli Saarela|
|6 Jun 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Inga Poguntke|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Jun 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Jun 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Inga Poguntke|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Jun 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Jun 2018||Editorially accepted|
|16 Jul 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12874-018-0535-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.