Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of non-Cochrane child-relevant systematic reviews published in 2014, overall and by type of review question

From: A descriptive analysis of non-Cochrane child-relevant systematic reviews published in 2014

Review characteristics

Overall

Type of review questiona

Therapeutic

Epidemiology

Diagnostic/Prognostic

Other

Total number of systematic reviews (%)

1598 (100.0)

753 (47.1)

701 (43.8)

91 (5.7)

53 (3.3)

Corresponding author: continent, n (%)

 Asia

299 (18.7)

123 (16.3)

148 (21.1)

25 (27.5)

3 (5.7)

 Africa

24 (1.5)

11 (1.5)

11 (1.6)

1 (1.1)

1 (1.9)

 North America

534 (33.4)

287 (38.1)

199 (28.4)

30 (33.0)

18 (34.0)

 South America

65 (4.1)

25 (3.3)

37 (5.3)

2 (2.2)

1 (1.9)

 Europe

535 (33.5)

255 (33.9)

232 (33.1)

26 (28.6)

22 (41.5)

 Oceania

141 (8.8)

52 (6.9)

74 (10.6)

7 (7.7)

8 (15.1)

Corresponding author: country income level (World Bank), n (%)

 High

1247 (78.0)

610 (81.0)

524 (74.8)

64 (70.3)

49 (92.5)

 Upper middle

317 (19.8)

126 (16.7)

163 (23.3)

25 (27.5)

3 (5.7)

 Lower middle

27 (1.7)

15 (2.0)

9 (1.3)

2 (2.2)

1 (1.9)

 Low

7 (0.4)

2 (0.3)

5 (0.7)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

Journal type, n (%)

 General medical

73 (4.6)

28 (3.7)

43 (6.1)

1 (1.1)

1 (1.9)

 Specialty medical

1137 (71.2)

535 (71.0)

503 (71.8)

67 (73.6)

32 (60.4)

 General pediatric

110 (6.9)

63 (8.4)

35 (5.0)

8 (8.8)

4 (7.5)

 Specialty pediatric

173 (10.8)

87 (11.6)

68 (9.7)

6 (6.6)

12 (22.6)

 Otherb

105 (6.6)

40 (5.3)

52 (7.4)

9 (9.9)

4 (7.5)

Sources of fundingc, n (%)

 Academic

228 (14.3)

96 (12.7)

118 (16.8)

9 (9.9)

5 (9.4)

 Government

557 (34.9)

239 (31.7)

265 (37.7)

37 (40.7)

16 (30.2)

 Industry

53 (3.3)

23 (3.1)

22 (3.1)

5 (5.5)

3 (5.7)

 Private (foundation)

193 (12.1)

81 (10.8)

97 (13.8)

8 (8.8)

7 (13.2)

 Other

32 (2.0)

13 (1.7)

14 (2.0)

3 (3.3)

2 (3.8)

 No funding

248 (15.5)

130 (17.3)

100 (14.2)

11 (12.1)

7 (13.2)

 Not reported

543 (34.0)

281 (37.3)

215 (30.7)

29 (31.9)

18 (34.0)

Review is an update, n (%)

32 (2.0)

18 (2.4)

11 (1.6)

2 (2.2)

1 (1.9)

Existing a-priori protocol for the reviewd, n (%)

 Yes (reported)

246 (15.4)

130 (17.3)

90 (12.8)

16 (17.6)

10 (18.9)

 No (reported)

16 (1.0)

7 (0.9)

8 (1.1)

1 (1.1)

0 (0.0)

 Not mentioned

1336 (83.6)

616 (81.8)

603 (86.0)

74 (81.3)

43 (81.1)

Registration of the reviewd, n (%)

 Yes (reported)

111 (6.9)

59 (7.8)

35 (5.0)

9 (9.9)

8 (15.1)

 No (reported)

24 (1.5)

9 (1.2)

12 (1.7)

3 (3.3)

0 (0.0)

 Not mentioned

1463 (91.6)

685 (91.0)

654 (93.3)

79 (86.8)

45 (84.9)

  1. aBased on the classification system previously suggested by Page et al. [9]
  2. bJournals that do not fit in the other categories (e.g., general science journals like PLoS ONE)
  3. cTotal is greater than 100% because some reviews report multiple sources of funding
  4. dAs reported by the review authors; we did not search for further evidence of a protocol or registration