Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 1 - development of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT)
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|8 Dec 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 May 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrea Marshall|
|13 May 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carole Anne Estabrooks|
|11 Oct 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Tim Rapley|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Oct 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Oct 2018||Editorially accepted|
|15 Nov 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12874-018-0590-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.