|
Sub-construct
|
Original NPT toolkit item
|
Sub-construct
|
Original NPT toolkit item
|
|
Differentiation: Whether the [intervention] is easy to describe to participants and whether they can appreciate how it differs or is clearly distinct from current ways of working.
|
Participants distinguish the intervention from current ways of working
|
Initiation: Whether or not key individuals are able and willing to get others involved in the new practice.
|
Key individuals drive the intervention forward
|
|
Communal specification: Whether participants have or are able to build a shared understanding of the aims, objectives, and expected outcomes of the proposed [intervention].
|
Participants collectively agree about the purpose of the intervention
|
Legitimation: Whether or not participants believe it is right for them to be involved, and that they can make a valid contribution
|
Participants agree that the intervention is a legitimate part of their work
|
|
Individual specification: Whether individual participants have or are able to make sense of the work – specific tasks and responsibilities - the proposed [intervention] would create for them.
|
Participants individually understand what the intervention requires of them
|
Enrolment: The capacity and willingness of participants to organize themselves in order to collectively contribute to the work involved in the new practice.
|
Participants buy in to delivering the intervention
|
|
Internalization: Whether participants have or are able to easily grasp the potential value, benefits and importance of the [intervention].
|
Participants construct potential value of the intervention for them/their work
|
Activation: The capacity and willingness of participants to collectively define the actions and procedures needed to keep the new practice going.
|
Participants continue to support the intervention
|
|
Cognitive Participation
|
Reflexive Monitoring
|
|
Sub-construct
|
Original NPT toolkit item
|
Sub-construct
|
Original NPT toolkit item
|
|
Interactional Workability: Whether people are able to enact the [intervention] and operationalise its components in practice
|
Participants perform the tasks required by the intervention
|
Systematization: Whether participants can determine how effective and useful the [intervention] is from the use of formal and/or informal evaluation methods
|
Participants access information about the effects of the intervention
|
|
Relational Integration: Whether people maintain trust in the [intervention] and in each other.
|
Participants maintain their trust in each other’s work and expertise through the intervention
|
Communal appraisal: Whether, as a result of formal monitoring, participants collectively agree about the worth of the effects of the [intervention]
|
Participants collectively assess the intervention as worthwhile for others
|
|
Skill set Workability: Whether the work required by the [intervention] is seen to be parcelled out to participants with the right mix of skills and training to do it
|
The work of the intervention is appropriately allocated to participants
|
Individual appraisal: Whether individuals involved with, or affected by, the [intervention], think it is worthwhile.
|
Participants individually assess the intervention as worthwhile for themselves
|
|
Contextual Integration: Whether the [intervention] is supported by management and other stakeholders, policy, money and material resources.
|
The intervention is adequately supported by its host organization
|
Reconfiguration: Whether individuals or groups using the [intervention] can make changes as a result of individual and communal appraisal.
|
Participants modify their work in response to their appraisal of the intervention
|
