Sub-construct | Item | Strength of correlation with global items (high/mod/low) | Correlation with other s-c items? | Higher correlation with items in other s-c? | Noteworthy correlation with other construct items? | Level of option B responding? % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Differentiation1 | I can distinguish the [intervention] from usual ways of working | Best for ‘will become’ (0.35), v low for other items. | Correlation of .70 with each other. | No | No | 8.9 |
Differentiation2 | I can see how the [intervention] differs from usual ways of working | Similar to diff1 (0.29 highest). | No | No | 8.1 | |
Communal spec1 | Staff in this organisation have a shared understanding of the purpose of the [intervention] | Approx 0.30 across all 3. | Moderate (0.59) | No | IndivSpec1 (0.50) | 4.2 |
Communal spec2 | Staff in this organisation have shared expectations about the likelihood of the success of the [intervention] | Low. Highest is 0.26 for ‘will become’. | No | Activation2 (0.51). Correlations with appraisal items in RefMon (0.46–.50). | 5.0 | |
Individual spec1 | I understand what tasks the [intervention] requires of me | Mod (0.40–0.47) | Moderate (0.67) | No | Internalization items (0.60 approx). CommSpec1 (0.50). Workability items (0.48&0.50). Legitimation items in CP (0.45 & 0.46) | 3.3 |
Individual spec2 | I understand how the [intervention] affects the nature of my own work | Mod (0.38–0.41) | No | Similar as for IndSpec1. | 3.1 | |
Internalization1 | I can see the potential value of the [intervention] for my work | Varies across 3 items. Mod (0.48) for ‘will become’, 0.34 for ‘is normal’, 0.29 for familiarity. | High (0.83) | No | IndSpec2, 0.61. Legit1, 0.61. Activ1, 0.65. Mod with appraisal items (RefMon), approx. 0.50–0.58 (IndApprais3). | 2.3 |
Internalization2 | I can see the worth of the [intervention] for me | Similar for items 1&2 (0.31 & 0.35). Mod (0.49) for ‘will become’. |  | As for internalisation1 | 2.5 |