Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 May 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Sep 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sara Macdonald|
|19 Sep 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2|
|14 Oct 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Konstantina Vasileiou|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Oct 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Oct 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Konstantina Vasileiou|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Oct 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Oct 2018||Editorially accepted|
|21 Nov 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.