Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Feb 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Diane Lorenzetti
9 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Igho Onakpoya
31 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Zachary Munn
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Igho Onakpoya
1 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Diane Lorenzetti
1 Nov 2018 Author responded Author comments - Zachary Munn
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Nov 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
6 Nov 2018 Editorially accepted
19 Nov 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement