Prognostic models for intracerebral hemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis

Table 3 RVE pooled c statistics and subgroup comparisons using metaregression

Prognostic tools	Nr studies	Nr tools	Pooled c-stat	95%CI		I²	ß	95%CI		p
Prognostic tools	Nr studies	Nr tools	Pooled c-stat	Lower	Upper	I²	ß	Lower	Upper	p
Overall	40	53	0·878	0·864	0·891	79%	–	–	–	–
Mortality prediction tools	30	38	0·880	0·865	0·894	80%	-0·007^a	-0·039^a	0·026^a	0·679
Functional outcome prediction tools	13	15	0·872	0·842	0·901	77%	-0·007^a	-0·039^a	0·026^a	0·679
Logistic regression based tools	37	43	0·874	0·858	0·889	76%	0·018^b	-0·034^b	0·070^b	0·490
Machine learning algorithms	6	9	0·898	0·821	0·976	88%	0·018^b	-0·034^b	0·070^b	0·490

ISSN: 1471-2288