Skip to main content

Table 4 Evidence to decision framework

From: Methods for trustworthy nutritional recommendations NutriRECS (Nutritional Recommendations and accessible Evidence summaries Composed of Systematic reviews): a protocol

 

Judgement

Research evidence

Additional considerations

PROBLEM

Is the problem a priority?

â—‹ No

â—‹ Probably no

â—‹ Probably yes

â—‹ Yes

â—‹ Varies

○ Don’t know

  

DESIRABLE EFFECTS

How substantial are the desirable anticipated effects?

â—‹ Trivial

â—‹ Small

â—‹ Moderate

â—‹ Large

â—‹ Varies

○ Don’t know

  

UNDESIRABLE EFFECTS

How substantial are the undesirable anticipated effects?

â—‹ Large

â—‹ Moderate

â—‹ Small

â—‹ Trivial

â—‹ Varies

○ Don’t know

  

CERTAINTY OF EVIDENCE

What is the overall certainty of the evidence of effects?

â—‹ Very low

â—‹ Low

â—‹ Moderate

â—‹ High

â—‹ No included studies

  

VALUES

Is there important uncertainty about or variability in how much people value the main outcomes?

â—‹ Important uncertainty or variability

â—‹ Possibly important uncertainty or variability

â—‹ Probably no important uncertainty or variability

â—‹ No important uncertainty or variability

  

BALANCE OF EFFECTS

Does the balance between desirable and undesirable effects favor the intervention or the comparison?

â—‹ Favors the comparison

â—‹ Probably favors the comparison

â—‹ Does not favor either the intervention or the comparison

â—‹ Probably favors the intervention

â—‹ Favors the intervention

â—‹ Varies

○ Don’t know

  

RESOURCES REQUIRED

How large are the resource requirements (costs)?

â—‹ Large costs

â—‹ Moderate costs

â—‹ Negligible costs and savings

â—‹ Moderate savings

â—‹ Large savings

â—‹ Varies

○ Don’t know

  

RESOURCES REQUIRED

What is the certainty of the evidence of resource requirements (costs)?

â—‹ Very low

â—‹ Low

â—‹ Moderate

â—‹ High

â—‹ No included studies

  

COST EFFECTIVENESS

Does the cost-effectiveness of the intervention favor the intervention or the comparison?

â—‹ Favors the comparison

â—‹ Probably favors the comparison

â—‹ Does not favor either the intervention or the comparison

â—‹ Probably favors the intervention

â—‹ Favors the intervention

â—‹ Varies

â—‹ No included studies

  

EQUITY

What would be the impact on health equity?

â—‹ Reduced

â—‹ Probably reduced

â—‹ Probably no impact

â—‹ Probably increased

â—‹ Increased

â—‹ Varies

○ Don’t know

  

ACCEPTABILITY

Is the intervention acceptable to key stakeholders?

â—‹ No

â—‹ Probably no

â—‹ Probably yes

â—‹ Yes

â—‹ Varies

○ Don’t know

  

FEASIBILITY

Is the intervention feasible to implement?

â—‹ No

â—‹ Probably no

â—‹ Probably yes

â—‹ Yes

â—‹ Varies

○ Don’t know