Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for pelvic girdle pain, including methods for measuring the outcomes: the PGP-COS study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Feb 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Aug 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tanja Stamm|
|20 Aug 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul A. Hendrick|
|27 Oct 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Francesca Wuytack|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Oct 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Nov 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Francesca Wuytack|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Nov 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Nov 2018||Editorially accepted|
|3 Dec 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12874-018-0624-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.