Skip to main content

Table 2 Numbers of: expressions of interest, the response rate and proportion of residents deemed eligible and ineligible, and those randomized: data presented according to the study cohorts and retirement villages

From: Strategies and challenges associated with recruiting retirement village communities and residents into a group exercise intervention

  

Expression of Interest

   

Village

Distributed

Response Rate n (%)

Eligibility Rate b n (%)

Ineligibility Rate b n (%)

Randomized cn (%)

Cohort 1 (n = 13)

1

70

21 (30.0)

16 (76.2)

5 (23.8)

12 (57.1)

2

155

35 (22.6)

28 (80.0)

7 (20.0)

11 (39.3)

3

60

15 (25.0)

14 (93.3)

1 (6.7)

12 (80.0)

4

65

14 (21.5)

12 (85.7)

2 (14.3)

11 (78.6)

5

80

12 (15.0)

9 (75.0)

3 (25.0)

7 (58.3)

6

170

16 (9.4)

12 (75.0)

4 (25.0)

8 (50.0)

7

126

24 (19.0)

21 (87.5)

3 (12.5)

16 (66.7)

8

156

14 (9.0)

10 (71.4)

4 (28.6)

5 (35.7)

9 a

65

5 (7.7)

5 (100)

0 (0)

a

10 a

22

1 (4.5)

0 (0)

1 (100)

a

11 a

56

5 (8.9)

2 (40)

3 (60)

a

12 a

45

9 (20.0)

5 (55.6)

4 (44.4)

a

13 a

80

5 (6.3)

3 (60.0)

2 (40)

a

  

1150

176 (15.3)

137 (77.8)

39 (22.2)

82 [46.7 (7.1 d)]

Cohort 2 (n = 6)

14

262

25 (9.5)

17 (68)

8 (32)

17 (68)

15

79

12 (15.2)

10 (83.3)

2 (16.7)

10 (83.3)

16

139

25 (18.0)

18 (72.0)

7 (28)

14 (56.0)

17

198

35 (17.7)

27 (77.1)

8 (22.9)

23 (65.7)

18

310

33 (10.6)

24 (72.7)

9 (27.3)

19 (57.6)

19

277

50 (18.1)

27 (54.0)

23 (46.0)

21 (42.0)

  

1265

180 (14.2)

123 (68.3)

57 (31.7)

104 [57.8 (8.2 d)]

Cohort 3 (n = 9)

20

120

22 (18.3)

21 (95.5)

1 (4.5)

15 (68.2)

21

169

13 (7.7)

13 (100)

0 (0)

12 (92.3)

22

144

19 (13.2)

19 (100)

0 (0)

16 (84.2)

23

134

14 (10.4)

12 (85.7)

2 (14.3)

8 (57.1)

24

196

19 (9.7)

17 (89.3)

2 (10.5)

15 (78.9)

25

154

27 (17.5)

24 (88.9)

3 (11.1)

21 (77.8)

26

120

16 (13.3)

13 (81.3)

3 (18.7)

12 (75.0)

27

350

27 (7.7)

16 (59.3)

11 (40.7)

15 (55.6)

28 a

145

4 (2.8)

3 (75.0)

1 (25.0)

a

  

1532

161 (10.5)

138 (85.7)

23 (14.2)

114 [70.8 (7.4 d)]

Total

3947

517 (13.1)

398 (77.0)

119 (23.0)

300 [58.0 (7.6 d)]

  1. a Retirement villages and participants deemed ineligible following screening due to inadequate participant numbers with a given village (< 6 individuals). Percentage response rates were calculated as a proportion to the number of expressions of interest received
  2. b Eligibility and ineligibility rates were calculated as a proportion of the response rate
  3. c Randomized rates were calculated as the proportion of the response rate
  4. d Randomized rates calculated as the proportion of the number of expression of interest distributed