| | |
Expression of Interest
| | | |
|---|
|
Village
|
Distributed
|
Response Rate n (%)
|
Eligibility Rate b n (%)
|
Ineligibility Rate b n (%)
|
Randomized cn (%)
|
|---|
|
Cohort 1 (n = 13)
|
1
|
70
|
21 (30.0)
|
16 (76.2)
|
5 (23.8)
|
12 (57.1)
|
|
2
|
155
|
35 (22.6)
|
28 (80.0)
|
7 (20.0)
|
11 (39.3)
|
|
3
|
60
|
15 (25.0)
|
14 (93.3)
|
1 (6.7)
|
12 (80.0)
|
|
4
|
65
|
14 (21.5)
|
12 (85.7)
|
2 (14.3)
|
11 (78.6)
|
|
5
|
80
|
12 (15.0)
|
9 (75.0)
|
3 (25.0)
|
7 (58.3)
|
|
6
|
170
|
16 (9.4)
|
12 (75.0)
|
4 (25.0)
|
8 (50.0)
|
|
7
|
126
|
24 (19.0)
|
21 (87.5)
|
3 (12.5)
|
16 (66.7)
|
|
8
|
156
|
14 (9.0)
|
10 (71.4)
|
4 (28.6)
|
5 (35.7)
|
|
9 a
|
65
|
5 (7.7)
|
5 (100)
|
0 (0)
|
a
|
|
10 a
|
22
|
1 (4.5)
|
0 (0)
|
1 (100)
|
a
|
|
11 a
|
56
|
5 (8.9)
|
2 (40)
|
3 (60)
|
a
|
|
12 a
|
45
|
9 (20.0)
|
5 (55.6)
|
4 (44.4)
|
a
|
|
13 a
|
80
|
5 (6.3)
|
3 (60.0)
|
2 (40)
|
a
|
| | |
1150
|
176 (15.3)
|
137 (77.8)
|
39 (22.2)
|
82 [46.7 (7.1 d)]
|
|
Cohort 2 (n = 6)
|
14
|
262
|
25 (9.5)
|
17 (68)
|
8 (32)
|
17 (68)
|
|
15
|
79
|
12 (15.2)
|
10 (83.3)
|
2 (16.7)
|
10 (83.3)
|
|
16
|
139
|
25 (18.0)
|
18 (72.0)
|
7 (28)
|
14 (56.0)
|
|
17
|
198
|
35 (17.7)
|
27 (77.1)
|
8 (22.9)
|
23 (65.7)
|
|
18
|
310
|
33 (10.6)
|
24 (72.7)
|
9 (27.3)
|
19 (57.6)
|
|
19
|
277
|
50 (18.1)
|
27 (54.0)
|
23 (46.0)
|
21 (42.0)
|
| | |
1265
|
180 (14.2)
|
123 (68.3)
|
57 (31.7)
|
104 [57.8 (8.2 d)]
|
|
Cohort 3 (n = 9)
|
20
|
120
|
22 (18.3)
|
21 (95.5)
|
1 (4.5)
|
15 (68.2)
|
|
21
|
169
|
13 (7.7)
|
13 (100)
|
0 (0)
|
12 (92.3)
|
|
22
|
144
|
19 (13.2)
|
19 (100)
|
0 (0)
|
16 (84.2)
|
|
23
|
134
|
14 (10.4)
|
12 (85.7)
|
2 (14.3)
|
8 (57.1)
|
|
24
|
196
|
19 (9.7)
|
17 (89.3)
|
2 (10.5)
|
15 (78.9)
|
|
25
|
154
|
27 (17.5)
|
24 (88.9)
|
3 (11.1)
|
21 (77.8)
|
|
26
|
120
|
16 (13.3)
|
13 (81.3)
|
3 (18.7)
|
12 (75.0)
|
|
27
|
350
|
27 (7.7)
|
16 (59.3)
|
11 (40.7)
|
15 (55.6)
|
|
28 a
|
145
|
4 (2.8)
|
3 (75.0)
|
1 (25.0)
|
a
|
| | |
1532
|
161 (10.5)
|
138 (85.7)
|
23 (14.2)
|
114 [70.8 (7.4 d)]
|
|
Total
|
3947
|
517 (13.1)
|
398 (77.0)
|
119 (23.0)
|
300 [58.0 (7.6 d)]
|
- a Retirement villages and participants deemed ineligible following screening due to inadequate participant numbers with a given village (< 6 individuals). Percentage response rates were calculated as a proportion to the number of expressions of interest received
- b Eligibility and ineligibility rates were calculated as a proportion of the response rate
- c Randomized rates were calculated as the proportion of the response rate
- d Randomized rates calculated as the proportion of the number of expression of interest distributed
