Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of assessment of bias

From: A scoping review of the problems and solutions associated with contamination in trials of complex interventions in mental health

Variable

Level

Trials with individual-level randomisation (n)

Trials with cluster randomisation (n)

Jadad score (possible range of 0–5; higher scores indicate lower likelihood of bias)

0

2 (1.4%)

1 (1.1%)

1

26 (18.8%)

22 (23.9%)

2

44 (31.9%)

32 (34.8%)

3

66 (47.8%)

37 (40.2%)

Allocation sequence adequately generated

Low risk

75 (53.2%)

44 (47.3%)

High risk

3 (2.1%)

1 (1.1%)

Unclear

63 (44.7%)

48 (51.6%)

Allocation sequence adequately concealed

Low risk

30 (21.3%)

18 (19.3%)

High risk

3 (2.1%)

1 (1.1%)

Unclear

108 (76.6%)

74 (79.6%)

Randomisation after consent obtained

Low risk

116 (82.3%)

23 (24.7%)

High risk

6 (4.3%)

39 (41.9%)

Unclear / NA

19 (13.5%)

31 (33.3%)

Randomisation after baseline measures were completed

Low risk

56 (39.7%)

15 (16.1%)

High risk

14 (9.9%)

41 (44.1%)

Unclear

71 (50.4)

37 (39.8%)

Baseline outcome measurements similar across trial arms

Low risk

109 (77.3%)

70 (75.3%)

High risk

9 (6.4%)

11 (11.8%)

Unclear / NA

23 (16.3%)

12 (12.9%)

Baseline demographic characteristics similar across trial arms

Low risk

121 (85.8%)

69 (74.2%)

High risk

3 (2.1%)

18 (19.4%)

Unclear / NA

17 (12.1%)

6 (6.5%)

Knowledge of allocation adequately concealed

Low risk

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

High risk

141 (100%)

93 (100%)

Blinded outcome assessment

Low risk

63 (44.7%)

29 (31.2%)

High risk

8 (5.7%)

17 (18.3%)

Unclear / NA

70 (49.6%)

47 (50.5%)

Incomplete outcome data

Low risk

35 (24.8%)

22 (23.7%)

High risk

82 (58.2%)

57 (61.3)

Unclear / NA

24 (17.0%)

14 (15.1%)

Similar attrition between trial arms

Low risk

85 (60.3%)

51 (54.8%)

High risk

30 (21.3%)

25 (26.9%)

Unclear / NA

26 (18.4%)

17 (18.3%)