Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Multiple imputation methods for handling missing values in a longitudinal categorical variable with restrictions on transitions over time: a simulation study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Nov 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachael Hughes
24 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
24 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Anurika De Silva
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachael Hughes
5 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Anurika De Silva
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachael Hughes
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Dec 2018 Editorially accepted
10 Jan 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12874-018-0653-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement