Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Sep 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christopher Carroll
3 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Noreen Orr
18 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Heather Ames
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christopher Carroll
3 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Heather Ames
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Heather Ames
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
14 Jan 2019 Editorially accepted
31 Jan 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12874-019-0665-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement