Challenges and benefits of integrating diverse sampling strategies in the observation of cardiovascular risk factors (ORISCAV-LUX 2) study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Jun 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katherine Sward|
|5 Nov 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2|
|20 Nov 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maria Grau|
|3 Dec 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Ala'a Alkerwi|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Dec 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Dec 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2|
|22 Jan 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Ala'a Alkerwi|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Jan 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Jan 2019||Editorially accepted|
|4 Feb 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12874-019-0669-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.