A methodological systematic review of meta-ethnography conduct to articulate the complex analytical phases
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Sep 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Oct 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peggy Shannon-Baker|
|2 Nov 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katy Sutcliffe|
|30 Nov 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Emma France|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Nov 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Dec 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peggy Shannon-Baker|
|21 Dec 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katy Sutcliffe|
|21 Jan 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Emma France|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Jan 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Jan 2019||Editorially accepted|
|18 Feb 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12874-019-0670-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.