Skip to main content

Table 1 Basic characteristics of the included protocols

From: A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017

Protocol characteristics

n = 544

Publication year

 

 2012

3.9%

 2013

10.3%

 2014

17.0%

 2015

19.5%

 2016

22.8%

 2017

26.7%

Country (most common)

 

 Canada

32.2%

 UK

26.1%

 Other

22.6%

 Australia

7.4%

 Germany

7.0%

 USA

4.8%

Topic area of SR

 

 Therapy (treatment, prevention)

44.1%

 Other (i.e. methodology)

27.0%

 Epidemiology (i.e. prevalence)

22.6%

 Diagnosis

4.2%

 Prognosis

2.0%

Source of funding of the SR

 

 Non-profit

62.9%

 For-profit/mixed

2.4%

 No funding

18.6%

 Not reported/unclear

16.2%

Number of authors

 

 Mean (SD)

6.5 (3.6)

 Median (IQR)

6 (4–8)

Registered in PROSPERO (n = 485; 89.2%)

 

 Before submission / acceptance

87.4%

 After submission / acceptance

2.5%

 Same day

10.1%

  1. Abbreviations: SR Systematic review; SD Standard deviation; IQR Interquartile range