Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Protocol registration or development may benefit the design, conduct and reporting of dose-response meta-analysis: empirical evidence from a literature survey

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Oct 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Juan Ruano Ruiz
22 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katharina Allers
5 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Chang Xu
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Juan Ruano Ruiz
8 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katharina Allers
17 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Chang Xu
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katharina Allers
1 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tim Mathes
6 Feb 2019 Author responded Author comments - Chang Xu
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Feb 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Feb 2019 Author responded Author comments - Chang Xu
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Feb 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
21 Mar 2019 Editorially accepted
11 Apr 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12874-019-0715-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement