Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Assessments of attrition bias in Cochrane systematic reviews are highly inconsistent and thus hindering trial comparability

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Nov 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Rotter
28 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matt Vassar
3 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Andrija Babic
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matt Vassar
11 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Andrija Babic
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Mar 2019 Author responded Author comments - Andrija Babic
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Mar 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
24 Mar 2019 Editorially accepted
5 Apr 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12874-019-0717-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement