TY - STD TI - Cull WL, O’Connor KG, Sharp S, Tang SS. Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians. Health Serv Res 2005;40(1):213–226. Available from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00350.x ID - ref1 ER - TY - STD TI - Cook JV, Dickinson HO, Eccles MP. Response rates in postal surveys of healthcare professionals between 1996 and 2005: an observational study. BMC HealthServ Res 2009;9(160). Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-160. ID - ref2 ER - TY - STD TI - Cho YI, Johnson TP, VanGeest JB. Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response. Eval Health Prof 2013;36(3):382–407. Available from https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278713496425. ID - ref3 ER - TY - STD TI - McLeod CC, Klabunde CN, Willis GB, Stark D. Health care provider surveys in the United States, 2000-2010: a review. Eval Health Prof 2013;36(1):106–126. Available from https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278712474001 ID - ref4 ER - TY - STD TI - Kellerman SE, Herold J. Physicians response to surveys. A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 2001;20(1):61–67. Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00258-0 ID - ref5 ER - TY - STD TI - Johnson TP, Wislar JS. Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys. JAMA-J Am Med Assoc. 2012;307(17). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.3532. ID - ref6 ER - TY - STD TI - Pit SW, Vo T, Pyakurel S. The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner’s survey response rates—a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014;14(76). Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-76. ID - ref7 ER - TY - STD TI - Jepson C, Asch DA, Hershey JC, Ubel PA. In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58(1):103–105. Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.06.004 ID - ref8 ER - TY - STD TI - Barclay S, Todd C, Finlay I, Grande G, Wyatt P. Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs. Fam Pract 2002;19(1):105–111. Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/19.1.105 ID - ref9 ER - TY - STD TI - Bjertnaes OA, Garrett A, Botten G. Nonresponse bias and cost-effectiveness in a Norwegian survey of family physicians. Eval Health Prof 2008;31(1):65–80. Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278707311874. ID - ref10 ER - TY - STD TI - VanGeest JB, Johnson TP, Welch VL. Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof 2007;30(4):303–321. Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278707307899 ID - ref11 ER - TY - STD TI - Flanigan TS, McFarlene E, Cook S. Conducting survey research among physicians and other medical professionals – a review of the current literature. New Orleans, LA: American Statistical Association Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section 2008;4136–4147. ID - ref12 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Ziegenfuss, J. Y. AU - Niederhauser, B. D. AU - Kallmes, D. AU - Beebe, T. J. PY - 2013 DA - 2013// TI - An assessment of incentive versus survey length trade-offs in a web survey of radiologists JO - J Med Internet Res VL - 15 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2322 DO - 10.2196/jmir.2322 ID - Ziegenfuss2013 ER - TY - CHAP AU - Leeuw, E. AU - Berzelak, N. ED - Wolf, C. ED - Joye, D. ED - Smith, T. W. ED - Fu, Y. PY - 2016 DA - 2016// TI - Survey mode or survey modes? BT - The SAGE handbook of survey methodology PB - SAGE Publications Ltd CY - London UR - https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957893.n11 DO - 10.4135/9781473957893.n11 ID - Leeuw2016 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Leece, P. AU - Bhandari, M. AU - Sprague, S. AU - Swiontkowski, M. F. AU - Schemitsch, E. H. AU - Tornetta, P. PY - 2004 DA - 2004// TI - Internet versus mailed questionnaires: a controlled comparison JO - J Med Internet Res VL - 6 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.4.e39 DO - 10.2196/jmir.6.4.e39 ID - Leece2004 ER - TY - STD TI - Scott A, Jeon S, Joyce CM, Humphreys JS, Kalb G, Witt J, et al. A randomized trial and economic evaluation of the effect of response mode on response rate, response bias, and item non-response in a survey of doctors. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011;11(126). Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-126. ID - ref16 ER - TY - STD TI - Dykema J, Jones NR, Piche T, Stevenson J. Surveying clinicians by web: current issues in design and administration. Eval Health Prof 2013;36(3):352–381. Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278713496630. ID - ref17 ER - TY - STD TI - Partin MR, Powell AA, Burgess DJ, Haggstrom DA, Gravely AA, Halek K, et al. Adding postal follow-up to a web-based survey of primary care and gastroenterology clinic physician chiefs improved response rates but not response quality or representativeness. Eval Health Prof 2015;38(3):382–403. Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278713513586. ID - ref18 ER - TY - STD TI - Beebe TJ, Jacobson RM, Jenkins SM, Lackore KA, Finney-Rutten LJ. Testing the impact of mixed-mode designs (mail and web) and multiple contact attempts within mode (mail or web) on clinician survey response. Health Serv Res 2018;53(S1):3070–3083. Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12827 ID - ref19 ER - TY - STD TI - Medway RL, Fulton J. When more gets you less: a meta-analysis of the effect of concurrent options on mail survey response rates. Public Opin Quart 2012;76(4):733–746. Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs047. ID - ref20 ER - TY - STD TI - Beebe TJ, Locke III GR, Barnes SA, Davern ME, Anderson KJ. Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians. Health Serv Res 2007;42(3 Pt 1):1219–1234. Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00652.x ID - ref21 ER - TY - STD TI - Puleo E, Zapka J, White MJ, Mouchawar J, Somkin C, Taplin S. Caffeine, cajoling, and other strategies to maximize clinician survey response rates. Eval Health Prof 2002;25(2):169–184. Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/016327870202500203. ID - ref22 ER - TY - JOUR AU - McMahon, S. R. AU - Iwamoto, M. AU - Massoudi, M. S. AU - Yusuf, H. R. AU - Stevenson, J. M. AU - David, F. PY - 2003 DA - 2003// TI - Comparison of e-mail, fax, and postal surveys of pediatricians JO - Pediatrics VL - 111 UR - https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.111.4.e299 DO - 10.1542/peds.111.4.e299 ID - McMahon2003 ER - TY - STD TI - Ash JS, Gorman PN, Seshadri V, Hersh WR. Computerized physician order entry in U.S. hospitals: results of a 2002 survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11(2):95–99. Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1427 ID - ref24 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Shah, T. U. AU - Voils, C. I. AU - McNeil, R. AU - Wu, R. AU - Fisher, D. A. PY - 2012 DA - 2012// TI - Understanding gastroenterologist adherence to polyp surveillance guidelines JO - Am J Gastroenterol VL - 107 UR - https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2012.59 DO - 10.1038/ajg.2012.59 ID - Shah2012 ER - TY - BOOK PY - 2016 DA - 2016// TI - Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys PB - AAPOR CY - Oakbrook Terrace ID - ref26 ER - TY - STD TI - Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, and Idaho (WWAMI) Rural Health Research Center. RUCA Data [Data set]. Available from http://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/ruca-download.php [Accessed 28th June 2018]. UR - http://depts.washington.edu/uwruca/ruca-download.php ID - ref27 ER - TY - BOOK PY - 2017 DA - 2017// TI - Stata Statistical Software: Release 15 PB - StataCorp LLC CY - College Station ID - ref28 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Seguin, R. AU - Godwin, M. AU - MacDonald, S. AU - McCall, M. PY - 2004 DA - 2004// TI - E-mail or snail mail? Randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys JO - Can Fam Physician VL - 50 ID - Seguin2004 ER - TY - STD TI - Cunningham CT, Quan H, Hemmelgarn B, Noseworthy T, Beck CA, Dixon E, et al. Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15(32) Available from https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0016-z. ID - ref30 ER - TY - STD TI - Groves RM, Presser S, Dipko S. The role of topic interest in survey participation decisions. Public Opin Quart 2004;68(1):2–31. Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfh002. ID - ref31 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Groves, R. M. AU - Singer, E. AU - Corning, A. PY - 2000 DA - 2000// TI - Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: description and an illustration JO - Public Opin Quart VL - 64 UR - https://doi.org/10.1086/317990 DO - 10.1086/317990 ID - Groves2000 ER - TY - STD TI - Wu AW, Folkman S, McPhee AJ, Lo B. Do house officers learn from their mistakes? BMJ Qual Saf 2003;12(3):221–226. Available from http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.3.221 ID - ref33 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Hobgood, C. AU - Hevia, A. AU - Tamayo-Sarver, J. H. AU - Weiner, B. AU - Riviello, R. PY - 2005 DA - 2005// TI - The influence of the causes and contexts of medical errors on emergency medicine residents’ responses to their errors: an exploration JO - Acad Med VL - 80 UR - https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200508000-00012 DO - 10.1097/00001888-200508000-00012 ID - Hobgood2005 ER - TY - STD TI - Waterman AD, Garbutt J, Hazel E, Dunagan WC, Levinson W, Fraser VJ, et al. The emotional impact of medical errors on practicing physicians in the United States and Canada. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2007;33(8):467–476. Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1553-7250(07)33050-X. ID - ref35 ER - TY - JOUR AU - Schwappach, D. L. B. AU - Boluarte, T. A. PY - 2009 DA - 2009// TI - The emotional impact of medical error involvement on physicians: a call for leadership and organizational accountability JO - Swiss Med Wkly VL - 139 ID - Schwappach2009 ER - TY - STD TI - James KM, Ziegenfuss JY, Tilburt JC, Harris AM, Beebe TJ. Getting physicians to respond: the impact of incentive type and timing on physician survey response rates. Health Serv Res 2011;46(1 Pt 1):232–242. Available from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01181.x. ID - ref37 ER -