Skip to main content

Table 2 Estimated cut-points when (k1, k2, a) equals (−8/5, 8/3, 1/2) in simulation data

From: A novel approach to determine two optimal cut-points of a continuous predictor with a U-shaped relationship to hazard ratio in survival data: simulation and application

Method

Pc = 0%

Pc = 20%

Pc = 50%

Median

Mean

Sim SE

Median

Mean

Sim SE

Median

Mean

Sim SE

Median ‘

−0.01

0.00

0.05

− 0.01

0.00

0.05

−0.01

0.00

0.05

Q1Q3_1

−0.68

−0.68

0.06

−0.68

− 0.68

0.06

− 0.68

−0.68

0.06

Q1Q3_2

0.67

0.67

0.07

0.67

0.67

0.07

0.67

0.67

0.07

MinP

−0.42

−0.40

0.13

−0.47

−0.48

0.15

−0.73

− 0.74

0.16

OEHR_1

−0.58

− 0.61

0.20

−0.65

− 0.65

0.19

− 0.80

− 0.77

0.22

OEHR_2

1.17

1.18

0.11

1.21

1.21

0.10

1.30

1.29

0.13

  1. Pc = censoring proportion; Sim SE = simulation standard error; Median ‘= using the median value of the continuous covariate as a cut-point; Q1Q3 = using the upper and lower quartiles values as cut-points, Q1Q3_1 is the upper quartile value and Q1Q3_2 is the lower quantile value; MinP = the single cut-point minimum p-value method with log-rank test; OHER = the optimal equal-HR method proposed in this study, OEHR_1 is the left estimated cut-point and OEHR_2 is the right estimated cut-point