Current approaches to identify sections within clinical narratives from electronic health records: a systematic review
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 Mar 2019||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Apr 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Madeleine Kittner|
|19 Apr 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yanshan Wang|
|22 May 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Alexandra Pomares-Quimbaya|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 May 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Jun 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Madeleine Kittner|
|24 Jun 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yanshan Wang|
|27 Jun 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Alexandra Pomares-Quimbaya|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Jun 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Jun 2019||Editorially accepted|
|18 Jul 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12874-019-0792-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.