Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 May 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melanie Bell
15 Oct 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
22 Nov 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ognjen Barcot
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Nov 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
14 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melanie Bell
15 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Ognjen Barcot
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Jan 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reviewer 2
23 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Ognjen Barcot
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Ognjen Barcot
Resubmission - Version 5
11 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
15 Jul 2019 Editorially accepted
5 Aug 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12874-019-0804-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement